Certificates and credits

It is possible to obtain a certificate from the course with a little extra work. The certificate is equivalent to 1 ECTS and your study supervisor will be able to register it as a credit in your university study credit system. Please make sure that your supervisor/study program accepts it.

Learners with a valid Aalto student number will automatically get the credit registered in Aalto systems. Please note that this does not apply to participants affiliated with TU Delft or other universities who have own criteria for workshop certificates and credits.

To obtain a certificate, you must be affiliated with a university, or similar research organisation. We expect you to follow the 6 days of the course and provide us with the following three text documents sent from your university email:

  1. A document that shows that you did the exercises during the course. Note: if you are planning to delete the exercise repository from your GitHub projects, instead of sending links to your work you can send PDF screenshots e.g. by doing "print to PDF" with your browser.
    • Write one or more paragraphs about Day 1 - Exercise 2: provide the link to the forked repository on your GitHub account and show that you did new commits. If you did not use GitHub and if you used the command line, then provide the output of the command git log --all for the forked repository. Explain what you did.
    • Write one or more paragraphs about Day 2 - Exercise 3: provide the link to the new repository you have created on your GitHub account. If you did not use GitHub and if you used the command line, then provide the output of the command git log --all for the newly created repository. Explain what you did.
    • Write one or more paragraphs about Day 3 - Exercise 1: provide the link to the pull request. Explain what you did.
  2. Written answers to the following four questions submitted as a document (pdf or word or txt). Evaluation criteria: we expect critical answers related to the content of first 3 days with both pros and cons (when relevant):
    • When should you work with branches?
    • What is the difference between a git clone and a git fork?
    • What is the difference between a fork and a branch?
    • What advantages and disadvantages to code review can you imagine/list?
  3. A personal reflection for each of the 6 days written as a document (pdf or word or txt, one paragraph per day). To get started, you can try answering the questions: "Why is this important? How can it improve my research work?" However any other personal reflection is welcome. Evaluation criteria: we expect reflections that are related to the content of each of the six days.

During the workshop we will provide with contact addresses where you should send these documents to.

As this is a very simple homework, the use of generative AI (like ChatGPT) is not allowed. We also have access to ChatGPT and we know how to write prompts that can generate the answers to these homework, so it is very easy for us to check when AI was used. Submissions suspected of being generated by AI will be rejected.


Funding

CodeRefinery is a project within the Nordic e-Infrastructure Collaboration (NeIC). NeIC is an organisational unit under NordForsk.

Privacy

Privacy policy

Follow us

Contact

support@coderefinery.org

Improve this page

Source code